There was a summer 3-4 years ago in the comment threads at the preeminent misanthrope conservative blog in town where I made the point, that much of the skating Ilhan Omar did on being a mediocre at best public servant and – plus double plus HAVING MARRIED HER BROTHER – was enabled by her being a pretty woman.
OMG the flip outs there, guys trying to claim she’s an uggo. Effing den of rill racists, btw.
Sorry man, no. Now that’s motivated delusion, looking at Ilhan Omar and saying she’s ugly. Based: she’s a good looking woman, has the good face, nice smile, actually always looks quite stylish.
So, I’m right, but what I learned: it’s a very very 3rd level point to make anyway. I don’t rule it out that you make that point in a campaign, but you better be tight with your language.
Enter Don Samuels. I knew what his point was immediately, there was enough there to know what the actual evaluation was, which was what mine was. But, not tight enough for public political discourse.
So, yes, there are a few people out there that get his point BUT disagree with him.
Here’s the thing that makes it true, and the people that do actually get it (Derusha and others) wrong.
Omar is meaningfully, civically combative right. She’s a firebrand.
That person as a Somali or Middle Eastern man in the United States does not get elected to Congress, alright. There’s a reason the squad is all women, yo.
That person as a Somali or Middle Eastern man can get elected to the Mn state house, as Omar did… but I don’t think that guy has the machine behind him to “almost” (Phyllis did still want the job) make it a fait accompli, as it was for Omar.
That person as a Somali or Middle Eastern man probably doesn’t get hand selected by Keith Ellison to be Keith Ellison’s successor because Keith Ellison knows….
That person as a Somali or Middle Eastern man probably doesn’t get embraced by the Jewish wing of the local DFL to get their crudeness with Israel worked out.