Conservative Outrage Du Jour: VA Scandal

Conservatives like to make wry observations about the lifecycle of an Obama administration scandal.  The lifecycle, wryly deconstructed, is:

  1. President hears about scandal on the news
  2. President is outraged, but notes a) scandal is because of rogue bureaucrats in the field b) scandal started under Bush
  3. Scandal is slow walked for a couple months, at which point it becomes a “phoney scandal”.  This is done with some assistance of sycophantic lefty media, who take cues from the Whitehouse to argue a) Republicans are misconstruing scandal facts because they are dumb b) Republicans are misconstruing scandal facts because they are racists
  4. Scandal is slow walked for a couple years, at which point it becomes ‘old news”.

With the VA, we’re still at the early stages.  The President is still finding out about it on the news that all these regional VAs have eerily / ironically similar patterns of misbehavior.  How weird!

Conservatives also like to complain that the Obama Administration never fires anyone for incompetence or malfeasance.  Truly I have mixed feelings on this.

On one hand, I know it’s fair and wise that the Administration doesn’t overreact to conservative hysteria, and that they should have an instinct to keep faithfully executing their duties / platform.  And as a conscientious but hysterical conservative, I’m mindful that with a cabinet secretary termination I should want something more than a bloodlust for ideological schadenfreude.  Things need to be fact based.

On the other hand…. Holder / Sebelius / Clapper are / were incompetent / duplicitous, and could have been justifiably fired for cause at any point after 2010.  That they remained so long lends credence to the observation that the President won’t ever fire anyone lest any critique be affirmed and the myth of Obama Administration hyper-competence be jeopardized.  Mind you, this is a myth that only the most partisan of Democrat’s believe anyway, but as a weird pander to the base it’s apparently got to be zealously protected, along with an assertion of competence for the President himself.  There’s also some racial and gender dynamics in there where people get a very long leash…

Anyway, inasmuch as wanting an Administration head to roll is a binary proposition, ie, its either warranted by the facts or is rather the bloodlust of conservative hysteria…its clearer here than in those other examples that a demand for Shinseki’s firing is completely appropriate.  He’s earned it.

And it’s not opaque.  Thus it’s its enormously dispiriting that we have to go through the lifecycle again,   where the President’s obliviousness and the obnoxious douchebaggery of Jay Carney and the blogging sycophants are the method by which VA is slow walked to irrelevance..

Thing is, I don’t think it’s going to work.  There’s not an obvious narrative here that Chait / Vox / TNR can carry without being absurd.  So they might as well fire Shinseki now.


8 thoughts on “Conservative Outrage Du Jour: VA Scandal

    1. Erik Petersen Post author

      I can extend some respect to him for that. But as I say, this one is sooooo obvious…. serious liberals don’t have a great option in picking up and parroting Carney and McDonough’s various inanities. They’ll look silly.

      I’m waiting for TPM to observe merely that boy, those conservatives are really getting worked up over the VA, chortle chortle …. but they are left to do this without actually making a serious rebuttal, because there isn’t one.

  1. pm1956

    yet more from Slate:

    My point here is that the lamestream media is quite willing to appropriately criticize Obama when there is a real scandal–but most of the conservative outrage du jour does not rise to the level of real scandal. Benghazi is not a scandal. The VA affair appears to be a real scandal. Obama is being appropriately criticized–the mainstream media is acting and behaving as it should (unlike the conservative media which is political in motivation). Even a stopped clock is right twice a day….

    1. Erik Petersen Post author

      I do give the conventional press credit for being capable of criticism, eventually. But they are biased, they have to be dragged to that point and there needs to be a complete absence of an alternative argument. Which is what we have here, it just can not be more cut and dried. So that’s great, under this circumstance a few left libs have come to the obvious conclusion.

      I am not so preoccupied with the ms media reaction, but do note that Chait / TNR / JM-TPM / MJ-Drum can’t be moved to comment on the news unless they can rebut it with an explanation of intransigent GOP / Conservatives / TP.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s